The first film was a hoot. This one was more of a shoot.
As long as you're fine with the fact that violence is a big fat joke, and Colin Firth's recovery from violence isn't a big fat joke, you won't be offended by installment one or two.
The first was understated - to a degree - and when overstated explained it away through comparisons to James Bond films - very cleverly in the coup de grâce from Samuel L to Colin F. There's irony all the way through the first film.
This is my theory on casting, as pitched to the actor's agents:
"Look guys, our first film made $400 million worldwide but only about a $100 million in America, so we're going to set the next one in America, and it will do double the business. Our idea is to stack it full of big-name stars, and we'll give a bonus of 1% of box office gross in the U.S. on every ticket sold. How many days can I get with <insert star's name > for $1 million plus 1% of gross?
The above article written by Philip Powers is protected by copyright and under Fair Use, 10% of it may be quoted or reproduced if properly credited, in another work. It may not be reproduced in its entirety in any form without the written consent of the author.
The author can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org. © 2017